Monday 21 May 2012

Facebook 2


The anti-social network: Life without Facebook

Some Facebook users are walking away from the site -- and their reasons for doing it run deep.
Some Facebook users are walking away from the site -- and their reasons for doing it run deep.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • It's the unlikeliest of tech trends: Deactivating from Facebook and social media sites
  • Some are leaving Facebook in favor of more "real" communication, free time
  • One study found that Facebook could make users more dissatisfied with their lives
  • Facebook defectors say they miss out on some events but are, overall, happier
(CNN) -- A bad breakup: Nothing can be as emotionally tumultuous for a young heart.
Except maybe finding out via your Facebook newsfeed that your college ex is dating someone from your fraternity.
That was the defining moment that eventually led Brolin Walters, 24, to ultimately break up with something else: Facebook.
"I didn't want to see what was going on with them," said Walters. "So I deactivated my account."
With a website that boasts 901 million active users and is launching an IPO on Friday, it seems unlikely that once you get on Facebook, you'd ever leave. But deactivating from the social networking site is not that unusual. Close to half of Americans think Facebook is a passing fad, according to the results of a new Associated Press-CNBC poll.
More and more people are stepping away from the technological realm and de-teching. There are even sites where they can pledge to delete their Facebook accounts. And tech writer Paul Miller from The Verge decided to leave the Internet for a year to reassess his relationship with it.
We asked whether any of you had left Facebook, and the responses urged in. From privacy issues to a need for more face time, the reasons for choosing to live without Facebook ran deep.
Maintaining a professional image
Although Walters, now a consultant, initially left Facebook for social reasons, he says he was also thinking about his career.
High school student Alexander Clark is already thinking about his career -- and that\'s why he deleted his Facebook account.
High school student Alexander Clark is already thinking about his career -- and that's why he deleted his Facebook account.
"You don't want a future employer to find something that they would deem questionable," he said.
Job prospects and personal privacy compelled high school student Alexander Clark, 18, to deactivate his Facebook account as well. Ever since he can remember, Clark has wanted to join the Air Force. Now, as he comes closer to making that dream a reality, he says he wants tomaintain a professional image.
"There are things on Facebook that I don't want my employer to see, and what I was told was 'what's on Facebook stays on Facebook.' "
Despite leaving the site for privacy reasons, Clark considers Facebook to be a pioneering company.
"I would totally buy their IPOs if I had the money, but I'm just not [as] into Facebook as I used to be, and I think it is from the life decisions I have made," he said.
Focusing on "real" communication
Putting in the effort to make a phone call: That's what Shiela O'Dea does now after deleting her Facebook account.
O'Dea's move off Facebook was gradual and started when she found the site went from being fun to being habitual. "I was literally on it all the time," she said. "When I first logged off for good, I would think about getting back on. But the more I stayed away from it, the more I realized I didn't need it."
Shiela O\'Dea felt Facebook was becoming too much of a habit, so she quit.
Shiela O'Dea felt Facebook was becoming too much of a habit, so she quit.
O'Dea says after deactivating from the site, she makes a greater effort to socially engage with others. "It's funny, it's called a social networking site, but we are sort of disconnecting," she said. "It is mass communicating, but we are losing something -- we are losing our interpersonal skills."
Chris Andrus says he started feeling the content on Facebook became impersonal and irrelevant to his life. So he and his wife deactivated their accounts after five years on the site. He says their social lives improved after leaving Facebook because now they focus on more in-person connections.
"We feel like we have strengthened relationships with close friends and family that are truly important to us, and not concerned ourselves with the other hundreds of 'friends' that really aren't important," he said.
Shedding an emotional burden
A study from Utah Valley University says there is a direct correlationbetween the amount of time spent on Facebook and the way people perceive their lives. Users that spent more time on the site reportedly thought their Facebook friends had better lives than themselves.
That definitely rings a bell for Andrea F. (who didn't want her last name used). She says Facebook made her perceive herself differently, and she felt pressured to be a certain way. The 28-year-old deleted her account 10 months ago when she realized how self-conscious Facebook made her feel. She started caring too much about what people she barely even knew thought about her profile and status updates, she explained.
"To make myself feel important, I made up exaggerated posts to garner attention from friends," she remembers. "Does that make sense ... no, but maybe I was not aware that I was unconsciously doing that until I got off [the site]."
Avoiding a time-waster
The average Facebook user spends more than six hours a week on the site. For some, that's just too much time.
As a young mother, Evelyn Bateman, 30, said Facebook transformed into a time-waster for her.
"I would sit on the computer, logged onto Facebook, looking at photos of my high school friends' baby pictures and I would think to myself, 'Wow I haven't talked to these people -- there are people I haven't spoken to in 10 years," she said.
After deactivating her account, Bateman found time to sit down with classic novels and spend more them with her young children. "It is so easy to lose an hour of time on Facebook," she said.
Bateman's friends and even her husband are still on the site. After deactivating from Facebook, she now notices that people are not as engaged with their real lives because they are so entranced with their cyberlives.
"My husband would get these updates of his friends at a bar, and they would be updating their Facebook with photos and he said, 'I wonder what it must be like to hang out with someone that is constantly updating,' " she said.
Maintaining personal privacy
Privacy was the biggest reason behind Tom Martin's deactivation from Facebook in 2011. The 23-year-old says that although the site is free to use, people are paying a price by providing their personal information. He says Facebook is swiftly making profiles more public, and he does not want to compromise his privacy.
"I do not want to be a part of this apparent mission to alter the norms of society," Martin said. "Facebook has frequently changed its privacy settings in the past and will do so again, always in favor of less privacy."
Despite his adamant stance on maintaining his deactivation from Facebook, Martin admits to missing the occasional social outing or party by not being a member of the site.
"There is somewhat of a social price to be paid for rebelling against the trend," he says, but he believes the people who really care about him will make the extra effort to stay in touch.
Brolin Walters says his network is \
Brolin Walters says his network is "smaller but stronger" after leaving Facebook.
A downside to de-teching?
Although de-teching is emerging as a trend, some people noticed a negative stigma attached to not having a Facebook account.
O'Dea says people usually can't believe it when she tells them she is not on the site. "They are shocked that I no longer communicate using Facebook, almost like there is something seriously wrong with me," she said.
Martin highlights similar experiences when people discover he is not on the social networking site. "Once in a while a person will respond as if you've attacked their religion and indignantly start defending the site and trying to convince me how great it is and why I should use it," he said.
Walters says he gets the "I can't believe you're not on Facebook" remark often. But he prefers face-to-face conversations much more than the digital, fleeting responses he would get via Facebook.
Even though he has noticed his social life change after Facebook, he says overall he is happy with his decision to deactivate.
"My network is smaller but stronger," he says.
CNN's Rachel Rodriguez contributed to this report.

Facebook


Facebook IPO underwhelms Web, too

Doug Gross, CNN
Click to play
See what Facebook users think about the IPO
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • NEW: Facebook stock closed nearly where it opened Friday
  • NEW: On rival Twitter, some smirked at lack of a price jump
  • Online, almost every financial or tech expert has an opinion
  • Facebook on Thursday afternoon set its initial share price at $38
(CNN) -- As the stock market opened Friday with a ring of the bell by Mark Zuckerberg, all eyes were on Facebook -- the social media Megalodon he nursed from a dorm-room project to one of Wall Street's hottest prospects ever.
Facebook, or "FB" as it's now known to investors, may have made amateur analysts on the Web go wild. But on the Nasdaq, it was a less exciting ride -- ending the day at a price pretty much exactly where it began.
Friends may be priceless. But 'friending' both started and ended the day at just over $38 a share.
Facebook's was the biggest opening ever for a tech company and the third-largest IPO in U.S. history, behind only Visa and General Motors.
On the Web, reactions ran the gamut from deliriously hopeful to harshly negative for the social-media giant's Wall Street potential.
Will the next generation use Facebook?
Facebook's timeline to IPO
How much are you worth to Facebook?
CNN Explains: IPOs
"A $104 billion market capitalization puts Facebook at more than 100 times its trailing earnings," wrote John Constine and Kim-Mai Cutler for technology blog TechCrunch. "That's a big multiple to live up to, and it will likely need to add bold new revenue streams to justify the mammoth valuation."
And it wasn't just the pros weighing in. In fact, it seemed like everyone on the Internet had an opinion.
Business Insider posted a poll (obviously not scientific) asking readers where they thought the $38 stock would be by the end of the day Friday.
Early Friday, a pessimistic 15% said under $35. But the biggest cluster of respondents had guessed somewhere between $40 and 55. (15% said $40 to 45, another 13% said $45 to 50 and, yes, yet another 12% said $50-55).
A hopeful 10% predicted the stock would skyrocket at otherworldly levels, winding up over $90 a share.
Results were similar on another site that sprung up,Facebook IPO Day Closing Price. Its graph showed the biggest number of predictions clustering around what ultimately would be an overly optimistic $50 mark.
On rival network Twitter, many observers seemed to be rooting against Facebook and its early investors, finding a measure of glee in the fact that the price didn't skyrocket as some had predicted.
"Facebook stock has already started to tank," wrote user Jen Misty (yes, with a healthy dose of hyperbole). "In my best Nelson voice from Simpsons -- "HA! HA!"
There was this swipe at youthful startup culture from tweeter Ross Heart: "Harder? Keeping $FB over 38 or trying to get hired at Facebook being over 38?"
And then there was this sports metaphor, which referenced a certain polarizing NBA star.
"Rooting against Facebook stock price > [is greater than] rooting against LeBron," wrote a user named Jay Kang.
More sober-minded watchers, however, noted that on Wall Street, when an opening stock sticks close to where it started, it means it was probably priced correctly to begin with.
"Few hours into trading and Facebook's stocks maintain a $40 value," wrote Giuseppe D'Antonio. "No drop, no frenzy behaviour, no wild fluctuations. Serious matter!"
While opinions in the business and tech communities have differed on whether the massive social network is a good investment, analysts have largely been bullish on the stock. There's been heavy demand, leading Facebook on Wednesday to announce it will sell about 25% more shares than it had originally planned, bringing its total to 421 million shares.
At CNN content partner Mashable, a blog that got its start focusing exclusively on social media and saw its popularity rise as Facebook's did, the staff geared up by creating an IPO-inspired playlist on music site Spotify (which, perhaps not coincidentally, is accessible only through a Facebook account).
Making the list? "Mo Money, Mo Problems," by The Notorious B.I.G., "Rich" by the Yeah Yeah Yeahs," "Money (That's What I Want) by Barrett Strong and "If I Had $1,000,000" by Barenaked Ladies, among others.
CNNMoney and CNN's Brandon Griggs contributed to this report.

Entertainment 4


April 30th, 2012
03:36 PM ET

Trailer Park: Peter Jackson defends 'Hobbit' footage

Trailers for three anticipated movies are creating quite a bit of buzz in Tinseltown - and one for not-the-most-flattering reasons.
According the Hollywood Reporter, “The Hobbit” director Peter Jackson is defending ten minutes of unfinished footage he showed at Cinemacon in Las Vegas last week, saying the audience’s less-than-enthusiastic response “wasn’t particularly surprising because it is something new.”
Instead of shooting the 3-D "Lord of the Rings" prequel at the  more standard rate of 24-frames-per-second, the filmmaker has gone with the faster rate of 48-frames-per-second, which yields a very different look.
“A lot of the critical response I was reading was people saying it’s different,” Jackson told THR. “Well, yes, it certainly is. But I think, ultimately, it is different in a positive way - especially for 3-D - for epic films and films that are trying to immerse the viewer in the experience of a story.”
We'll see if Jackson's theory holds true when "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" opens December 14.
Meanwhile, sci-fi thriller “Prometheus, helmed by Ridley Scott, looks like it packs some cool surprises, though aesthetically, probably not as many as “The Hobbit.”
A two-and-a-half minute trailer for the alien-themed epic was released over the weekend, and shows a crew of explorers - including Charlize Theron, Idris Elba and Guy Pearce - searching for the origins of mankind.
In the clip, Theron’s character introduces herself, saying, “My name is Meredith Vickers, and it’s my job to see you do yours,” as she welcomes some new recruits on a very secret, highly-dangerous mission.
Noomi Rapace and Michael Fassbender also star in the flick, which is being billed as kind of an “Aliens” prequel where humans are tasked to draw the link between ancient civilizations and the future.
“Prometheus” debuts June 8.
And last but not least is Judd Apatow's "This Is 40," a sort-of-but-not-really sequel to 2007's "Knocked Up."
Paul Rudd and Leslie Mann reprise their "Knocked Up" roles as married parents Pete and Debbie in the film, which picks up their story a few years following the events of "Knocked Up."
Pete and Debbie's two kids are older, but most importantly, so are they - and the age of 40 comes with a host of changes, as seen in the trailer below.
"This Is 40" opens December 21.

Entertainment 3


April 23rd, 2012
05:42 PM ET

'Dark Knight Rises' trailer to screen before 'Avengers'

Warner Bros., home to DC Comics, has announced that it's attaching the third and final trailer for its long-awaited movie “The Dark Knight Rises” to Marvel’s “The Avengers,” which hits theaters on May 4, according to NolanFans.com.
This isn't the first time the two comics mainstays joined forces. DC and Marvel teamed up four years ago, when Warner Bros. promoted the final trailer for 2008's "The Dark Knight" during a screening of Marvel's "Iron Man," which came out a few months before.
So far the decision is looking like a total win for everyone involved: "The Avengers" is reportedly tracking to make at least $150 million during its opening weekend, and Warner Bros. doesn't want to miss out on that audience.
"We see this placement as a good strategic decision," one exec told Deadline. "We always want our trailers to be seen with films that people want to see - and a lot of people will be going to see 'The Avengers!'"

Entertainment 2


April 19th, 2012
11:18 AM ET

Watch: Trailer for Channing Tatum's 'Magic Mike'

The recent poll on summer's most anticipated movies left out an obvious title, at least for us: Channing Tatum's stripper movie "Magic Mike."
Slated for a June 29 release, "Magic Mike" has had quite a build-up, between the slow reveal of the cast to the first stills to the teaser trailer that hit the Web earlier this week.
On Thursday, we finally got to see the full show. And despite what the plot implies, the two-and-a-half minute clip is actually fairly free of nudity.
Tatum, 31, stars as the titular "magical" male stripper, a role that's loosely based on Tatum's real-life experience of exotic dancing in Tampa.
By night, Mike plays to the fantasies of his patrons, being the "husband they never had, the dreamboat guy that never came along." But by day, he's more interested in crafting and selling furniture - and perhaps falling in love with Paige, as played by Cody Horn. A stripper/entrepreneur, if you will.
So why does he strip? First of all, he's making good money - although you don't want to know what he has to do for a $20 - and there's also "women...and a good time."
Tatum has called his time spent as an exotic dancer "a wild and pivotal time" in his life, and it looks like some of that will be carried over to the film as well.
Directed by Steven Soderbergh, "Magic Mike" also stars Matt Bomer, Alex Pettyfer, Matthew McConaughey and "True Blood's" Joe Manganiello as "Big Dick Richie."
Source : http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2012/04/19/watch-trailer-for-channing-tatums-magic-mike/